22 Comments

There's no global warming going on people. There's an agenda here and it's NOTHING to do with the well being of our planet and especially nothing to with ANY concerns for humanity. Globalists agenda and they've seen their last days. They're getting ridiculous actually... Taking farmers from farming.. omg.. just don't comply. Don't buy their fear tactics. We're strong, and fooled once, shame on you. Fool us twice? Your times up and it's about time.

Expand full comment

Can NASA really be that incompetent? Yes, when they are paid to be.

Expand full comment

It's that old phrase, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."

Expand full comment

Or like dedicated pharma research scientists who are not paid one dime, till the product is deemed, [cough!] "Save and Effective"!

Expand full comment

Eloquently stated by Upton Sinclair!

Expand full comment

No, they're not that incompetent. This article is either incompetent or dishonest. Look it all up for yourself.

Expand full comment

As stated in the article this is simple analysis using Excel. The temperature anomaly data is readily available from Berkeley Earth. Please perform an independent analysis.

Expand full comment

Can you compare our god-playing, [vote buying free stuff government's NASA ?] To "evil free enterprise" Space X? I can, I worked in the gov. space industry and saw the billions of dollars wasted! It's easy when you are spending sucker taxpayer's money!

Expand full comment

So, you have done this type of research and have come to different conclusions? Please link us to your work.

Expand full comment

please link me to your work showing this analysis is incompetent or dishonest

Expand full comment

Those poor scientists and advisors who have spent their entire careers invested in what turns out to be nonsense.

Expand full comment

Not to the investor's & pharma's bottom line! What better way to make money, than to make suckers sick, than offer/ force salvation, in the form of death jabs!

Expand full comment

Many thanks for this and for your other work on this highly charged subject. It has taken me a long time to distance myself (as a layman) from the scientific consensus on anthropogenic warming; to grasp that consensus does not in itself guarantee reliability of conclusions; then to be struck (indeed illuminated) by the intensity of animosity, censorship and slander directed at the those scientists who question the normal paradigm - as has happened to those challenging the given understanding of things through the ages. In Galileo's time, geocentrism (that the earth is the centre of the solar system) was upheld by scientists, by state and church as well as by commonsense - "See the sun rise, see it pass overhead, see it set, while the earth under my feet stands still"), I believe that the Vatican has now apologised to the memory of Galileo for using the inquisition to silence his heliocentric propositions about our solar system - but the apology came nearly four centuries after Gallileo published his 'Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems' (1632).

Expand full comment

If? you want to know about the corrupted fake/ evil Vatican! Google Catholic apologist, Ann Barnhardt! She has the low-down on evil Burgosie, the anti-Pope!

Expand full comment

Thanks for your work. I am slowly realising how highly distorted 'the truth' becomes, under the influence of political and commercial factors, also how high the uncertainties are.

Scientists including Steven Koonin and William Happer seem to have made sensible comments. The former wrote a 2021 book 'Unsettled'. I am slowly reading it, almost word by word. Much of the problem is that the media and some scientific bodies using misleading phrases which don't reflect the data in the chart(s).

The late great Richard Feynman wasn't a climate scientist. But he had much to say on the desperate need for scientific integrity. Koonin also makes a plea for this at the front of his book. It may be a dig at some of his colleagues.

Possibly some observed warming is a combination of a) natural factors and b) fossil fuel combustion in especially the past 40 years. Have a look at a chart showing the rate of world coal, oil and natural gas extraction and how it took off after that.

Expand full comment

When you manipulate the weather collection stations and remove cold ones... then including the Urban Heat Effect it can ALWAYS show warming. Deceit by exclusion

Expand full comment

The earth warmed and cooled long before the ["God is dead"] Industrial Revolution! Now in our [Satain is alive] world, suckers can be fooled into worshiping and believing almost anything!

Expand full comment

Bollox

Expand full comment

Fascinating, and understandable, analysis of (what should be) an obvious conclusion---it's the sun!

Expand full comment

There is good evidence here that the sun is the major factor https://judithcurry.com/2024/04/18/how-we-know-that-the-sun-changes-the-climate-part-i-the-past/

Expand full comment

Berkeley Earth uses the same massaged data that NASA GISS and the other rubes use. There was no significant warming.

Expand full comment

In order to own and control Godless fools and suckers, it's best to instill fear, hate or greed, then offer a way to salvation! I.e. Just a knock-off and reverse of God's plan! I.e. one leads to Hell, the other, to Heaven! So live with it, you don't have to be the foolish sucker!

Expand full comment